[vimeo http://vimeo.com/72139899] So technically I'm on vacation, but I had to mention this ad because it just seems so... oblivious.
Two things struck me about this ad:
1. How similar in tone and content it is to the Spitzer ad(s). I don't think that's a coincidence.
2. Anthony Weiner just doesn't get it. An ad that ignores what's happened to him only reinforces the idea that he doesn't get it, that's he's arrrogrant. The subtext of this ad is everything he's trying to avoid. Instead of confronting his personal issues like Spitzer did in his first ad, Weiner uses the same tone and message, but without similar results.
You can say you get it all you want (which is essentially what Weiner is doing), but if telling people you get it shows them that you don't get it, well which story do you think wins?